Unfortunately, the customer lacks a backup for the software. Should they consider purchasing Cimplicity Machine Edition instead? Will this software package support programming for the 9030 series? I was about to recommend that the customer opts for Versapro. Thank you!
If your PLC program was developed using either Logicmaster 90-30 or VersaPro, you can easily connect and modify it using VersaPro. However, if the program was created with Cimplicity Machine Edition, you may face limitations and might not be able to modify it with VersaPro. It's important to note that programs developed in Logicmaster 90-30 become incompatible with Logicmaster once modified in VersaPro. Cimplicity Machine Edition (CME) is the programming software that GE Fanuc will continue to support in the coming years. CME is designed for programming both the latest PAC Systems PLCs and the older Series 90 PLCs. Unfortunately, VersaPro cannot program the newer models as they are not compatible. For optimal performance, VersaPro can run on a computer with a minimum of 32 MB of RAM, while CME requires at least 128 MB for effective operation. The part number for VersaPro designed for the 90-30 series is IC646VPS300, and for Cimplicity Machine Edition, it is IC646MPS001. Both software packages are priced at $800.00.
By focusing on keywords like "PLC programming," "VersaPro compatibility," and "Cimplicity Machine Edition support," this rephrased text aims to enhance search engine visibility while maintaining the original meaning.
Thank you for the information, Steve! I appreciate it. I'm considering exploring VersaPro for use on two identical machines. I'm confident it will meet their requirements effectively. Best regards, JT.
Johnny T commented: "Lynn, I was raised in Burnley and currently reside just ten miles away. For the entire week, I'm working in Blackburn, which is essentially adjacent to Burnley. By the way, did you ever have a job with a company located in Warrington? Just a thought!" - Homer.
I indeed worked for a company located in Warrington. I'm curious—why do you ask? Does my reputation precede me? Are we familiar with each other? Best, JT
Subject: Inquiry About Previous Collaboration
Hi Johnny,
I believe you might have completed some projects for us at our whisky bottling facility in Kilmarnock. Am I right in remembering this?
Best,
Steve
Absolutely, I completed a significant amount of work at that location. Are you employed there, or do you operate as a contractor? Feel free to send me a private message so we can discuss it outside of the forums. Thanks!
Subject: Update on Shipping and Cable Pickup
Hi Jonny,
I hope this message finds you well! I wanted to follow up to see if you received the email I sent earlier. If not, no worries—my team member has already departed.
The good news is that we're scheduled to ship some components to Lancashire in the next week or two. I would be more than happy to include the cable in that shipment and inform the team at the plant that you'll be picking it up. This will help you save on shipping costs!
Please let me know how you'd like to proceed.
Best regards,
Lynn Davis
Subject: Follow-Up on Your Email
Hi Alvin,
I haven't received your email yet, but I appreciate your efforts! I'm eager to get the details, including the location and timing. Feel free to send me a private message if that's more convenient for you.
You're amazing—thank you so much!
Best,
JT
It appears there may be a compatibility issue between the Versapro and LM90 programming software. I noticed a subtle variation in memory usage within the PLC CPU when using these two programming tools. Therefore, it’s advisable to stick with the original programming platform that was used to configure the PLC. I attempted to alternate between LM90 and Versapro to achieve compatibility, but unfortunately, this approach did not yield successful results for me. – Chris
boxofrelays stated: "There appears to be a compatibility issue between the VersaPro and LM90 programming environments. These two platforms exhibit slight variations in memory usage on the PLC CPU, so it's essential to use the programming software that was initially used to configure the PLC. I attempted to alternate between LM90 and VersaPro to see if it was feasible, but unfortunately, it didn't work for me." -Chris
Click to expand... "This was the situation nine years ago, and it remains unchanged today. However, I recommend using Proficy ME for a more efficient programming experience. If anyone is still in search of the programming cable, this forum link is a great place to start: http://forums.ge-ip.com/showthread.php?p=60395#post60395"
I apologize for jumping into a conversation from nine years ago! It's likely that the individuals in the earlier discussion may no longer be active, as they could be deceased, incarcerated, or have advanced to managerial roles. -Chris
Boxofrelays mentioned: "The earlier discussion likely involves members who are either deceased, incarcerated, or have advanced to managerial roles. Just to clarify, this excludes Steve." - Eric
Absolutely! I want to give a nod to Steve. It's essential to have knowledgeable professionals in the field who truly understand their craft. Some may be resistant to letting go of their tried-and-true tools—like myself, still utilizing the LM90, which places me in that 'seasoned veteran' category. - Chris
boxofrelays commented: Apologies for replying to a discussion that dates back nine years! The earlier comments probably come from individuals who are no longer around—either deceased, incarcerated, or have moved on to management roles. -Chris Click to expand... I'm still actively participating (I'm the original poster, though I’m using a new username!). There have been moments when I felt like I was at my lowest, but thankfully, I haven't let it take hold of me just yet! I've managed to stay out of jail! Although I've been offered management positions, I really enjoy my current role and have no desire to change.
RussB noted: "What was true nine years ago remains valid today—Proficy ME is undoubtedly the best option for your needs. If you're on the hunt for a programming cable, this is an excellent starting point: [Original Forum Link](http://forums.ge-ip.com/showthread.php?p=60395#post60395). Please be aware that the old link is no longer functional (it’s frustrating when these change!), so instead, check out the GE Knowledge site for comprehensive information. Don't forget to explore the results across multiple pages for a more robust understanding. For a more direct solution, visit this link: [GE Knowledge Article on Serial Ports Pin Assignment](https://ge-ip.force.com/communities/en_US/Article/Serial-Ports-Pin-Assignment)."
When we refer to a "zombie thread," we describe the situation where someone replies to a discussion after several years of inactivity. But what term should we use for responding to posts that are three years old, which were originally replies to discussions that are even nine years old?
"Apocalyptic Events and Themes: Understanding End-of-World Scenarios"
Ah, the echoes of history! For those interested, I successfully managed to run LM90 on Windows XP, which is operating within Oracle VirtualBox (a free virtualization software). This setup is hosted on a 64-bit Dell computer running Windows 10. Surprisingly, this vintage software continues to function, and I'm still successfully tackling challenges with my old hardware! Sending warm Aloha from Hawaii!
Steve Bailey remarked, "If a 'zombie thread' refers to responding after years of inactivity, what do you call it when you reply to posts that are three years old and were originally responses to posts from nine years ago? Ha ha! I just noticed that. My mistake! Still, it's great to see that we're all still engaged and active!"
I completely concur with CaseyK. It’s essential to thoroughly research your eBay purchases before finalizing any transactions! Investing in items that may not be compatible with your existing parts can lead to unnecessary expenses. Taking the time to do your homework in this situation can truly be beneficial! Always ensure you’re informed to make the best purchasing decisions on eBay!
It seems that “conducting your research” often overlooks verifying the date of the content you’re endorsing.
**Seeking Replacement for CPU 363**
Hello! I am currently searching for a CPU 363, but I am finding it difficult to locate one. Can anyone advise me on whether I can replace the CPU 363 with any of the following models?
- CPU 350
- CPU 351
- CPU 352
- CPU 360
- CPU 364
- CPU 374
I am looking for suitable options as I only need to install a new CPU and download the necessary program onto it. I do not intend to carry out any additional modifications. Which of these CPUs would be a compatible replacement for the CPU 363?
Thank you in advance for your assistance!
Steve Bailey commented, "It seems that ‘doing your research’ doesn’t actually involve verifying the publication date of the post you're endorsing." Click to expand... How ironic, especially given the most recent post by irfan80.
It's unclear why user irfan80 is hesitant to initiate a new discussion thread. Instead, they've chosen to revive an old thread, often referred to as a “zombie thread,” and have also posted the same inquiry regarding the TON (Timer On Delay) instruction within an Allen Bradley PLC in another forum.
Zombie replies... While the GE 90-30 series has been phased out in favor of the advanced GE RX3i series PLC/PAC, the IC693CPU364 serves as an excellent alternative to the IC693CPU363 and can still be found on the surplus market. If you're considering an upgrade to a more modern RX3i CPU, we recommend utilizing the RX3i universal backplane, along with a new entry-level RX3i CPU and a compatible power supply. To migrate your legacy ladder logic, you can use GE's machine addition tool, making the transition seamless. Additionally, all of your original 90-30 I/O modules will easily fit into the new RX3i backplane. Your colleagues will surely commend your expertise and foresight as you lead this upgrade.